What 9 Cases from Kamala Harris’s Past Reveal About Her Record as a California Prosecutor

Kamala Harris, now a prominent political figure as the Vice President of the United States, has a long and storied career that includes her tenure as the District Attorney of San Francisco and later as the Attorney General of California. Throughout her career in law enforcement, Harris handled numerous high-profile cases that have shaped her public image and influenced perceptions of her as a leader. The following analysis examines nine significant cases from her past, shedding light on her record as a prosecutor and the complex legacy she has left behind.

1. People v. Gregory Allen Johnson (2004)

Gregory Allen Johnson was convicted of killing San Francisco Police Officer Isaac Espinoza in 2004. This case gained national attention because Harris, then the District Attorney of San Francisco, declined to seek the death penalty, a decision that drew sharp criticism from law enforcement and political figures, including U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein. Harris’s stance reflected her broader opposition to the death penalty, a position that would later define much of her career.

2. People v. Robert Baker (2004)

In a controversial case, Robert Baker was charged with child molestation, but the case was dismissed due to the mishandling of evidence by the police. Harris faced criticism for the decision to dismiss the charges, with some arguing that it reflected a lack of coordination between her office and law enforcement. This case highlighted the challenges of prosecuting sensitive cases and the importance of procedural integrity.

3. Prosecution of the “Black Muslims Bakery” (2007)

Kamala Harris led the prosecution of members of the “Your Black Muslim Bakery” in Oakland, an organization involved in criminal activities, including the murder of journalist Chauncey Bailey. Harris’s successful prosecution of the case was seen as a significant achievement, showcasing her ability to tackle complex and politically sensitive cases. It also underscored her commitment to addressing violent crime in underserved communities.

4. People v. Deborah Madden (2010)

Deborah Madden, a former San Francisco Police Department lab technician, was accused of tampering with drug evidence, leading to the dismissal of hundreds of drug cases. Harris, who was the Attorney General of California at the time, faced criticism for her handling of the case. Critics argued that Harris’s office should have been more vigilant in overseeing the police department’s operations. This case emphasized the importance of maintaining oversight and accountability within the criminal justice system.

5. Proposition 8 and Same-Sex Marriage (2010)

As Attorney General of California, Kamala Harris refused to defend Proposition 8, a California ballot proposition that sought to ban same-sex marriage. Her decision not to defend the proposition played a pivotal role in its eventual overturning by the courts. This case highlighted Harris’s support for LGBTQ+ rights and her willingness to take bold stands on controversial issues, a stance that has earned her both praise and criticism.

6. People v. Edwin Ramos (2008)

Edwin Ramos, an illegal immigrant and MS-13 gang member, was convicted of the murder of Tony Bologna and his two sons in San Francisco. The case became a flashpoint in the debate over sanctuary cities and immigration policy. Harris’s office prosecuted Ramos, and the case drew national attention, particularly from conservative critics who argued that sanctuary city policies were to blame for the tragedy. This case illustrated the complexities of immigration enforcement and the challenges of balancing public safety with immigrant rights.

7. Mortgage Crisis and National Mortgage Settlement (2012)

During the height of the mortgage crisis, Harris played a crucial role in securing a $25 billion settlement for California homeowners as part of the National Mortgage Settlement. Harris’s aggressive negotiation tactics and refusal to accept an initial lower settlement offer earned her national recognition. This case showcased her ability to take on powerful financial institutions and advocate for the rights of everyday citizens, enhancing her reputation as a consumer advocate.

8. Three Strikes Law Reform (2012)

As Attorney General, Kamala Harris supported the reform of California’s Three Strikes Law, which mandated life sentences for third-time felony offenders, even for non-violent crimes. Harris’s support for Proposition 36, which allowed for the re-sentencing of non-violent offenders serving life sentences under the Three Strikes Law, was a significant step in criminal justice reform. This case demonstrated her evolving stance on criminal justice issues and her recognition of the need for a more equitable legal system.

9. People v. George Gage (2015)

One of the more controversial cases in Harris’s career involved George Gage, who was convicted of sexual abuse based on the testimony of his stepdaughter. Years later, evidence emerged suggesting that the prosecution had withheld key information that could have exonerated Gage. Harris’s office opposed Gage’s appeal, leading to widespread criticism. This case raised questions about her commitment to justice and transparency, particularly in cases where new evidence could change the outcome.

Conclusion

Kamala Harris’s record as a California prosecutor is complex and multifaceted. The nine cases discussed here offer a glimpse into her approach to law enforcement, her values, and the challenges she faced in her roles as District Attorney and Attorney General. While she has been praised for her advocacy on behalf of vulnerable populations and her efforts to reform the criminal justice system, she has also faced criticism for decisions that some view as overly cautious or politically motivated. As Harris continues her political career on the national stage, these cases will remain a significant part of her legacy, offering both insights and lessons into her approach to leadership and governance.